Effective on November 5, 2025, New York State adopted a new law, General Business Law Article 47, dealing with Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) companions. (Shortly afterward, California adopted a similar law with some differences and other states have adopted other laws dealing with similar issues.) While this blog is not comprehensive or legal advice, as always, the law makes it unlawful for an “operator” to operate for or provide an “AI companion” unless it contains a protocol (which it spells out in slightly greater detail) for detecting and addressing suicidal ideation or expressions of self-harm from a user, with a notice to the user of crisis services. An “AI companion” is defined, in summary, to include a system using AI, generative AI and/or emotional recognition algorithms to simulate a sustained human or human-like relationship (meeting certain criteria) with a user. A “user” is defined to be someone who is using the system for personal reasons and so the law may not apply to commercial counterparts. Notice that the user is not communicating with a human must be given to the user at the beginning of the interaction and at least once every three hours. The attorney general has the right of enforcement, with a penalty of up to $15,000 per day. Unlike the California law, there is no private right of action. The fees, fines and penalties under the law must go into a suicide prevention fund. The N.Y. law is among the first comprehensive attempts to address this issue, but there is an increasing welter of differing state rules and it seems likely the attempts to regulate this new technology at the state level will continue.
Pages
Archives
- November 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- November 2024
- April 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
Categories
- Alternative Energy (2)
- Anti-Money Laundering (6)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Brexit (1)
- Broker-Dealers (34)
- Commodities (4)
- Coronavirus Relief (5)
- Corporate (34)
- Corporate – U.K. (8)
- Cryptocurrencies (19)
- Currency Trading (5)
- Data Privacy (2)
- Data Protection (7)
- Financial Institutions (18)
- Financial Services – U.K. (5)
- Funds – EU (2)
- Funds – Offshore (3)
- Funds – U.S. (12)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Investment Advisers (11)
- Investment in the UK (2)
- Investment in United States (6)
- Loans (4)
- M&A (5)
- Not-for-Profit (2)
- Pandemic (2)
- Private Securities Offerings (13)
- Public Securities Offerings/IPOs (3)
- Securities (27)
- Securities Markets (9)
- Tax Havens (1)
- U.S. Constitution (1)
- Uncategorized (21)
- Venture Capital (13)
- Whistleblowing (4)
- Workers (2)
